Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 13:37:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8A558731DA2BFA3FA92AC3BF12EB1544BEEBE61A8B60B841CED09A7B40DCA9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Jordan Peterson is not discrediting the authors' based on their names. He is clearly remarking about the humour in a paper which refers to penises, where the authors are named variations of "wang". Also, there are clear typos in the currently proposed community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774043802807751114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8A558731DA2BFA3FA92AC3BF12EB1544BEEBE61A8B60B841CED09A7B40DCA9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1711805845999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774043802807751114D8A558731DA2BFA3FA92AC3BF12EB1544BEEBE61A8B60B841CED09A7B40DCA9B