Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 14:57:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4537A22070169F6EDA0CAD1F522D123A9C83130537BB598E41CDF8364C28D26
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Jordan Peterson is not discrediting the authors' based on their names. He is clearly remarking about the humour in a paper which refers to penises, where the authors are named variations of "wang". Also, there are clear typos in the currently proposed community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774043802807751114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4537A22070169F6EDA0CAD1F522D123A9C83130537BB598E41CDF8364C28D26
  • createdAtMillis - 1711810630790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774043802807751114C4537A22070169F6EDA0CAD1F522D123A9C83130537BB598E41CDF8364C28D26