Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 15:26:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17D27A8096E464062577D53C5995DE22171392F1B7B2E7288DD2CD4B86122DB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Jordan Peterson is not discrediting the authors' based on their names. He is clearly remarking about the humour in a paper which refers to penises, where the authors are named variations of "wang". Also, there are clear typos in the currently proposed community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774043802807751114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17D27A8096E464062577D53C5995DE22171392F1B7B2E7288DD2CD4B86122DB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1711812379719
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177404380280775111417D27A8096E464062577D53C5995DE22171392F1B7B2E7288DD2CD4B86122DB1