Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 13:46:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11941BD441167A7A8A85DC9A0893ECFD1F4D4B0F2758CC5527878779029DE73D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Jordan Peterson is not discrediting the authors' based on their names. He is clearly remarking about the humour in a paper which refers to penises, where the authors are named variations of "wang". Also, there are clear typos in the currently proposed community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774043802807751114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11941BD441167A7A8A85DC9A0893ECFD1F4D4B0F2758CC5527878779029DE73D
  • createdAtMillis - 1711806361808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177404380280775111411941BD441167A7A8A85DC9A0893ECFD1F4D4B0F2758CC5527878779029DE73D