Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 15:40:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F97E247959209E67916B6746E8D7EDF90F0481E0A27A70063690BCC7A3B1739E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Bill Maher is stating a discussion of dissenting opinions should have been allowed. This is his opinion stated on his own show. For every article that can be cited stating it was safe and effective, another can be cited stating the opposite, ie; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20420986241226566

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774043763217662073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F97E247959209E67916B6746E8D7EDF90F0481E0A27A70063690BCC7A3B1739E
  • createdAtMillis - 1711813203828
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774043763217662073F97E247959209E67916B6746E8D7EDF90F0481E0A27A70063690BCC7A3B1739E