Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 16:15:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64A8E93ACD90A74907CFAF425A0A9819E3AA8AC2DA8DA861D1464AC8130774CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Imagine citing Rolling Stone as a reliable source and pretending it's not pure sensationalist trash.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773878232187900307
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64A8E93ACD90A74907CFAF425A0A9819E3AA8AC2DA8DA861D1464AC8130774CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1711815345287
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177387823218790030764A8E93ACD90A74907CFAF425A0A9819E3AA8AC2DA8DA861D1464AC8130774CB