Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 10:55:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96BBF204BFEB1F791781CE48A972D4B75B44E57E78C4FAF14059BB1D43B8D39A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The fact that the community note is voted up is ridiculous. It’s obvious from the screenshot that Gliner was prepared to pass judgment on someone in their place of employment based on their appearance (which Gliner has a history of doing) which is what the post is pointing out.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773874944482664911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96BBF204BFEB1F791781CE48A972D4B75B44E57E78C4FAF14059BB1D43B8D39A
  • createdAtMillis - 1711796139993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177387494448266491196BBF204BFEB1F791781CE48A972D4B75B44E57E78C4FAF14059BB1D43B8D39A