Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 15:43:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6E358C19E4ABDF54C9F22C49309A27C15586FF66E3CAD40A36D9EB1F219154D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The numbers are factually correct, and there's no further claim stated in the tweet itself. That readers might draw conclusions without considering all the nuances of the data doesn't make the data wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773597376592363877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6E358C19E4ABDF54C9F22C49309A27C15586FF66E3CAD40A36D9EB1F219154D
  • createdAtMillis - 1711727004410
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773597376592363877F6E358C19E4ABDF54C9F22C49309A27C15586FF66E3CAD40A36D9EB1F219154D