Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 13:32:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C29D3D01283CB2C3173EF1E8A1E57DA35A875F1A8AAC3B97F0710AA75E5C1C7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The numbers are factually correct, and there's no further claim stated in the tweet itself. That readers might draw conclusions without considering all the nuances of the data doesn't make the data wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773597376592363877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C29D3D01283CB2C3173EF1E8A1E57DA35A875F1A8AAC3B97F0710AA75E5C1C7F
  • createdAtMillis - 1711719146298
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773597376592363877C29D3D01283CB2C3173EF1E8A1E57DA35A875F1A8AAC3B97F0710AA75E5C1C7F