Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 17:32:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5047B17D2F0B1624B0EB5504CF5628DC96446BF8A7EA96293399E155DB4BBA8A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The numbers are factually correct, and there's no further claim stated in the tweet itself. That readers might draw conclusions without considering all the nuances of the data doesn't make the data wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773597376592363877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5047B17D2F0B1624B0EB5504CF5628DC96446BF8A7EA96293399E155DB4BBA8A
  • createdAtMillis - 1711733534354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17735973765923638775047B17D2F0B1624B0EB5504CF5628DC96446BF8A7EA96293399E155DB4BBA8A