Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 11:48:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The numbers are factually correct, and there's no further claim stated in the tweet itself. That readers might draw conclusions without considering all the nuances of the data doesn't make the data wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773597376592363877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618
  • createdAtMillis - 1711712922399
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17735973765923638774CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618