Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 06:08:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6163504B8058E6B41A93B247AB2CEAB822368459A090233D7ACC37E42E64D702
Participant Details

Original Note:

Assumes static laws, ignores variance within, then falsely concludes the US shouldn’t use mail-in ballots. Fails to address dynamic nuances incl. safeguards per jurisdiction, e.g., US: states regulate elections & change. *Live docket of cases found at below. Search: mail in. https://www.democracydocket.com/cases

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773526763353616581
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6163504B8058E6B41A93B247AB2CEAB822368459A090233D7ACC37E42E64D702
  • createdAtMillis - 1711692528346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17735267633536165816163504B8058E6B41A93B247AB2CEAB822368459A090233D7ACC37E42E64D702