Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 13:27:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAEFE12DC71C0010B39DC52390FD2AD94234223D5CEBDC104EACDECA3D3CB4EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

A pesquisa foi encomendada pelo PP, não pelo PL alegado no post: https://twitter.com/centralpolitcs/status/1773024633261899795?s=19 O instituto Paraná Pesquisas foi um dos mais assertivos em 2022, principalmente no 2º turno. https://www.em.com.br/app/noticia/politica/2022/11/07/interna_politica,1417895/acertos-e-autocriticas-dos-institutos-de-pesquisa-sobre-2022.shtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773458280813035837
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAEFE12DC71C0010B39DC52390FD2AD94234223D5CEBDC104EACDECA3D3CB4EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1711718865197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773458280813035837BAEFE12DC71C0010B39DC52390FD2AD94234223D5CEBDC104EACDECA3D3CB4EB