Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 21:32:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA4008B9F2DCD47014E8A6BDF3DCDC35369518799C58D8B34708B6E5E7D679DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'avvocato a cui si riferisce il post non ha perso la causa. È stato dichiarato il non luogo a procedere, poiché l'autore ha rimosso il post diffamatorio. L'avvocato non è stato condannato a pagare le spese processuali, come sarebbe stato richiesto in caso di sconfitta. https://twitter.com/iurimariaprado/status/1773415733327769626?t=xmhJ2sSjDjM2EEbv8nR5ww&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773435598927270150
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA4008B9F2DCD47014E8A6BDF3DCDC35369518799C58D8B34708B6E5E7D679DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1711747951058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773435598927270150DA4008B9F2DCD47014E8A6BDF3DCDC35369518799C58D8B34708B6E5E7D679DC