Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 10:44:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 362BB31F7F82F1855E5E3787C297C845FC118A8ADEF680C652C52136FCEF7DDC
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'avvocato a cui si riferisce il post non ha perso la causa. È stato dichiarato il non luogo a procedere, poiché l'autore ha rimosso il post diffamatorio. L'avvocato non è stato condannato a pagare le spese processuali, come sarebbe stato richiesto in caso di sconfitta. https://twitter.com/iurimariaprado/status/1773415733327769626?t=xmhJ2sSjDjM2EEbv8nR5ww&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773435598927270150
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 362BB31F7F82F1855E5E3787C297C845FC118A8ADEF680C652C52136FCEF7DDC
  • createdAtMillis - 1711709058140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773435598927270150362BB31F7F82F1855E5E3787C297C845FC118A8ADEF680C652C52136FCEF7DDC