Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 00:17:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4D9AFABEE65BE95DC299735014C56CA7D5F8C51870FD23489250A394D0D1283
Participant Details

Original Note:

2 points why this post requires a note. 1. Mr. Poilievre only reiterates the analysis of the PBO. There are no false claims. 2. Guibeault did not attach the open letter, list the economists, their credentials, their place of employment. Can only be construed as misinformation https://www.taxpayer.com/newsroom/pbo-report-shows-ottawa%E2%80%99s-carbon-tax-rhetoric-was-always-bluster

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773425499337036086
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4D9AFABEE65BE95DC299735014C56CA7D5F8C51870FD23489250A394D0D1283
  • createdAtMillis - 1711671471425
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773425499337036086E4D9AFABEE65BE95DC299735014C56CA7D5F8C51870FD23489250A394D0D1283