Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-28 21:38:07 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D3D5DBFF504848DE72C74CD01F704A2620BDC21F0BDF8E21EC3AE1275D6D048A
Participant Details
Original Note:
2 points why this post requires a note. 1. Mr. Poilievre only reiterates the analysis of the PBO. There are no false claims. 2. Guibeault did not attach the open letter, list the economists, their credentials, their place of employment. Can only be construed as misinformation https://www.taxpayer.com/newsroom/pbo-report-shows-ottawa%E2%80%99s-carbon-tax-rhetoric-was-always-bluster
All Note Details