Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 01:54:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

2 points why this post requires a note. 1. Mr. Poilievre only reiterates the analysis of the PBO. There are no false claims. 2. Guibeault did not attach the open letter, list the economists, their credentials, their place of employment. Can only be construed as misinformation https://www.taxpayer.com/newsroom/pbo-report-shows-ottawa%E2%80%99s-carbon-tax-rhetoric-was-always-bluster

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773425499337036086
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1711677244397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177342549933703608636E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2