Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 20:25:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 219707A25CD21995C109F4D5B13154265EA3707A4A2370677762BDA3A9E0B967
Participant Details

Original Note:

2 points why this post requires a note. 1. Mr. Poilievre only reiterates the analysis of the PBO. There are no false claims. 2. Guibeault did not attach the open letter, list the economists, their credentials, their place of employment. Can only be construed as misinformation https://www.taxpayer.com/newsroom/pbo-report-shows-ottawa%E2%80%99s-carbon-tax-rhetoric-was-always-bluster

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773425499337036086
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 219707A25CD21995C109F4D5B13154265EA3707A4A2370677762BDA3A9E0B967
  • createdAtMillis - 1711657502911
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1773425499337036086219707A25CD21995C109F4D5B13154265EA3707A4A2370677762BDA3A9E0B967