Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-29 03:10:42 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1E7B30BF17C9F09E673D1630A02BFEDA77E11999D94DDD79C459D1730490950D
Participant Details
Original Note:
2 points why this post requires a note. 1. Mr. Poilievre only reiterates the analysis of the PBO. There are no false claims. 2. Guibeault did not attach the open letter, list the economists, their credentials, their place of employment. Can only be construed as misinformation https://www.taxpayer.com/newsroom/pbo-report-shows-ottawa%E2%80%99s-carbon-tax-rhetoric-was-always-bluster
All Note Details