Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-06 22:59:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0CC6665022A1A75B98A17B60DD9E8A7ABA8E93A6F3A6E645D314AF76F89BEB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court decision on ivermectin is problematic legally and on policy grounds. Legally, the court did not interpret – or address at all – the statutory provision the FDA relied on for the posts, 21 U.S.C. 375(b), and ignored the jurisprudence interpreting it. https://www.newsweek.com/fda-settles-lawsuit-over-ivermectin-social-media-posts-1882562#:~:text=The%20FDA%20has%20agreed%20to,for%20animals%20and%20not%20humans.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773397741785210980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0CC6665022A1A75B98A17B60DD9E8A7ABA8E93A6F3A6E645D314AF76F89BEB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1712444368574
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1773397741785210980C0CC6665022A1A75B98A17B60DD9E8A7ABA8E93A6F3A6E645D314AF76F89BEB4