Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 22:01:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The errors are summarised in the article: ‘Fox […] failed to provide enough signatures of support in two London boroughs, while three supporters from other boroughs could not be found in records.” https://amp.theguardian.com/culture/2024/mar/28/laurence-fox-ruled-out-london-mayor-contest-errors-nomination

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773373348954734915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1711663278553
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773373348954734915970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC