Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 10:44:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A183F5C0B95A740A667238E14925D6CA55DD2E4D7B97E0BF55EBEBCC89310AAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Het artikel bevat enkel insinuaties en geen goed onderbouwd bewijs. Hiermee voldoet het artikel niet aan de code van bordeaux. https://www.nvj.nl/themas/journalistieke-praktijk/ethische-regels/code-bordeaux

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773288214561738943
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A183F5C0B95A740A667238E14925D6CA55DD2E4D7B97E0BF55EBEBCC89310AAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1711622669333
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773288214561738943A183F5C0B95A740A667238E14925D6CA55DD2E4D7B97E0BF55EBEBCC89310AAE