Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 13:54:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79BD259C99FDFC8DC30DD6792A51650CDBD3B15E93E3DDB82FD8B6C5E92D892C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article does not contain the specific reason for his dismissal. Those with "high factuality" are reporting there is an investigation by counterintelligence after new information about the officer became known. None of them are claiming proof of anything yet. https://t.co/9xC4xNo9ZC

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773255877832904912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 79BD259C99FDFC8DC30DD6792A51650CDBD3B15E93E3DDB82FD8B6C5E92D892C
  • createdAtMillis - 1711634095550
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177325587783290491279BD259C99FDFC8DC30DD6792A51650CDBD3B15E93E3DDB82FD8B6C5E92D892C