Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 15:28:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2310A44C68876E6FEAFE2608F01D75E4D0668828120A61393A3BD3639CE82700
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article does not contain the specific reason for his dismissal. Those with "high factuality" are reporting there is an investigation by counterintelligence after new information about the officer became known. None of them are claiming proof of anything yet. https://t.co/9xC4xNo9ZC

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773255877832904912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2310A44C68876E6FEAFE2608F01D75E4D0668828120A61393A3BD3639CE82700
  • createdAtMillis - 1711639734510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17732558778329049122310A44C68876E6FEAFE2608F01D75E4D0668828120A61393A3BD3639CE82700