Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 09:39:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14D5A9A1A935DC2DF609AF05B7BAB41AEDC38D2908FE10D9727D9001E7CB79D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article does not contain the specific reason for his dismissal. Those with "high factuality" are reporting there is an investigation by counterintelligence after new information about the officer became known. None of them are claiming proof of anything yet. https://t.co/9xC4xNo9ZC

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773255877832904912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14D5A9A1A935DC2DF609AF05B7BAB41AEDC38D2908FE10D9727D9001E7CB79D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1711618775128
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177325587783290491214D5A9A1A935DC2DF609AF05B7BAB41AEDC38D2908FE10D9727D9001E7CB79D1