Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 12:45:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sadly typical of today's public conversations that those who object to this factual and very telling Post cite other countries'use of remote balloting. But most of those are examples of other countries which do so, but generally only under very specific limiting circumstances!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773186486357107035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E
  • createdAtMillis - 1711629951958
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773186486357107035F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E