Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 19:10:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87ED80D118819C5FA166ED7C03F6D63432355A5B3A1E60A2D38FDBCC7DA22C98
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sadly typical of today's public conversations that those who object to this factual and very telling Post cite other countries'use of remote balloting. But most of those are examples of other countries which do so, but generally only under very specific limiting circumstances!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773186486357107035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87ED80D118819C5FA166ED7C03F6D63432355A5B3A1E60A2D38FDBCC7DA22C98
  • createdAtMillis - 1711653008141
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177318648635710703587ED80D118819C5FA166ED7C03F6D63432355A5B3A1E60A2D38FDBCC7DA22C98