Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 11:17:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 74FBBD24C4829D574AC2E7A6D334D569BA9F528DE5E080D4BE7E8F6B76286297
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sadly typical of today's public conversations that those who object to this factual and very telling Post cite other countries'use of remote balloting. But most of those are examples of other countries which do so, but generally only under very specific limiting circumstances!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773186486357107035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 74FBBD24C4829D574AC2E7A6D334D569BA9F528DE5E080D4BE7E8F6B76286297
  • createdAtMillis - 1711624654103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177318648635710703574FBBD24C4829D574AC2E7A6D334D569BA9F528DE5E080D4BE7E8F6B76286297