Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 08:54:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sadly typical of today's public conversations that those who object to this factual and very telling Post cite other countries'use of remote balloting. But most of those are examples of other countries which do so, but generally only under very specific limiting circumstances!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773186486357107035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10
  • createdAtMillis - 1711616040907
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177318648635710703566F114B50A6D8BC3C722B4327A4EC5A992E6FE11E2DB189DB8D93D5703A81F10