Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 16:57:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0104B118D1642AF0F67098C6096A0EA6D3F04A296D27B339251AB93154A5CEED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sadly typical of today's public conversations that those who object to this factual and very telling Post cite other countries'use of remote balloting. But most of those are examples of other countries which do so, but generally only under very specific limiting circumstances!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773186486357107035
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0104B118D1642AF0F67098C6096A0EA6D3F04A296D27B339251AB93154A5CEED
  • createdAtMillis - 1711645047782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17731864863571070350104B118D1642AF0F67098C6096A0EA6D3F04A296D27B339251AB93154A5CEED