Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 09:11:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26CF639720317882A0554200360EEBAAA7464932199458A9D4A88DD292F2461C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Incorrect to assume crumple zones are always better than rigidity. The purpose of a crumple zone is to target the energy absorption from the crash away from the cargo. In this example, the Tesla passenger would be sitting in a crumple zone, so rigidity is better. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crumple_zone https://www.crashtest.org/side-impact-protection-system/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773178722591654179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26CF639720317882A0554200360EEBAAA7464932199458A9D4A88DD292F2461C
  • createdAtMillis - 1711617062774
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177317872259165417926CF639720317882A0554200360EEBAAA7464932199458A9D4A88DD292F2461C