Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 22:18:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083
Participant Details

Original Note:

A note MIGHT be needed, but suggested NYT link does not discuss how much NYC valued the property at, nor does it imply that any substantial renovations were added to the purchase price. Both the 5.8M NYT purchase value and the 1.8M NYC value might be correct at the same time

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773121365006037206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083
  • createdAtMillis - 1711664294285
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177312136500603720671DA36677F372804CCE4325C3A29520E15829EDA5F36854FFDD3B9F8F489E083