Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 01:40:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 462C1F744B7BB4F22AA417DBFBC0674DBBBDF525AB4EBA556EFEAA5C19537BBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

A note MIGHT be needed, but suggested NYT link does not discuss how much NYC valued the property at, nor does it imply that any substantial renovations were added to the purchase price. Both the 5.8M NYT purchase value and the 1.8M NYC value might be correct at the same time

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1773121365006037206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 462C1F744B7BB4F22AA417DBFBC0674DBBBDF525AB4EBA556EFEAA5C19537BBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1711590013043
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1773121365006037206462C1F744B7BB4F22AA417DBFBC0674DBBBDF525AB4EBA556EFEAA5C19537BBF