Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-27 14:45:33 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E141EED0D4154D4A01265D86CE3E9AA2ED62976B3F730CAB18F1B244BAE6EB67
Participant Details
Original Note:
The original care pathway was driven by the political views of the clinicians running the service. Care was rated as inadequate. There was no evidence of benefit even from their own research project, and the Tavistock was criticised by the High Court for withholding data. https://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/Biggs_ExperimentPubertyBlockers.pdf https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj.q742 https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o2016/rr
All Note Details