Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-27 13:01:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 20B26BB3FED0AB4E1D98D7FA24822ED2638772D0E41428B1E40B09A726C820DC
Participant Details
Original Note:
The original care pathway was driven by the political views of the clinicians running the service. Care was rated as inadequate. There was no evidence of benefit even from their own research project, and the Tavistock was criticised by the High Court for withholding data. https://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/Biggs_ExperimentPubertyBlockers.pdf https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj.q742 https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o2016/rr
All Note Details