Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-28 09:55:44 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0C365A3D0C5687097CEA1C9BCD0E9754181EE93E0F2CFB8466C9BFC65B0FA966
Participant Details
Original Note:
The original care pathway was driven by the political views of the clinicians running the service. Care was rated as inadequate. There was no evidence of benefit even from their own research project, and the Tavistock was criticised by the High Court for withholding data. https://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/Biggs_ExperimentPubertyBlockers.pdf https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj.q742 https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o2016/rr
All Note Details