Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-27 11:22:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF44A718E368F5EDC68D39454A4FE88EF948D5E7F88AFDDE01AA9E53678208A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

In der BVerfG-Entscheidung 1 BvR 2019/16 geht es nicht um ein "drittes Geschlecht". Es geht um "Menschen, die sich dauerhaft weder dem männlichen noch dem weiblichen Geschlecht zuordnen lassen", also Menschen mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung (Intersexuelle). https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772924881056804961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF44A718E368F5EDC68D39454A4FE88EF948D5E7F88AFDDE01AA9E53678208A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1711538570469
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772924881056804961FF44A718E368F5EDC68D39454A4FE88EF948D5E7F88AFDDE01AA9E53678208A3