Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 10:32:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF029B91B5B4DD4D812C1E984372219EAE05407E7CE7B47A2F9420D8276D5403
Participant Details

Original Note:

In der BVerfG-Entscheidung 1 BvR 2019/16 geht es nicht um ein "drittes Geschlecht". Es geht um "Menschen, die sich dauerhaft weder dem männlichen noch dem weiblichen Geschlecht zuordnen lassen", also Menschen mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung (Intersexuelle). https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772924881056804961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF029B91B5B4DD4D812C1E984372219EAE05407E7CE7B47A2F9420D8276D5403
  • createdAtMillis - 1711621965004
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772924881056804961EF029B91B5B4DD4D812C1E984372219EAE05407E7CE7B47A2F9420D8276D5403