Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-27 12:29:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBF520EC2713B9EC207E193771DB2F20A4BEA4A9AF4248ACEF3DFB14C2A0E068
Participant Details

Original Note:

In der BVerfG-Entscheidung 1 BvR 2019/16 geht es nicht um ein "drittes Geschlecht". Es geht um "Menschen, die sich dauerhaft weder dem männlichen noch dem weiblichen Geschlecht zuordnen lassen", also Menschen mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung (Intersexuelle). https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772924881056804961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBF520EC2713B9EC207E193771DB2F20A4BEA4A9AF4248ACEF3DFB14C2A0E068
  • createdAtMillis - 1711542564767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772924881056804961EBF520EC2713B9EC207E193771DB2F20A4BEA4A9AF4248ACEF3DFB14C2A0E068