Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-27 14:35:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A062F6A8D0BDAD7D9AC66E088910A5AB4B625E5E8DBBFF15618293C7C63D63EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

In der BVerfG-Entscheidung 1 BvR 2019/16 geht es nicht um ein "drittes Geschlecht". Es geht um "Menschen, die sich dauerhaft weder dem männlichen noch dem weiblichen Geschlecht zuordnen lassen", also Menschen mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung (Intersexuelle). https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772924881056804961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A062F6A8D0BDAD7D9AC66E088910A5AB4B625E5E8DBBFF15618293C7C63D63EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1711550101732
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772924881056804961A062F6A8D0BDAD7D9AC66E088910A5AB4B625E5E8DBBFF15618293C7C63D63EC