Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-27 16:12:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04551DC5364D47A54823FBD99D24D56AEDE85E0D8003C1A6BF009FDD537C1F6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

In der BVerfG-Entscheidung 1 BvR 2019/16 geht es nicht um ein "drittes Geschlecht". Es geht um "Menschen, die sich dauerhaft weder dem männlichen noch dem weiblichen Geschlecht zuordnen lassen", also Menschen mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung (Intersexuelle). https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772924881056804961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04551DC5364D47A54823FBD99D24D56AEDE85E0D8003C1A6BF009FDD537C1F6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1711555952970
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177292488105680496104551DC5364D47A54823FBD99D24D56AEDE85E0D8003C1A6BF009FDD537C1F6A