Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-27 06:38:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 546320A5463D9A58412AA8E79782D6727E120E1139FC78AAF299E6C8B76C8E65
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es sind lediglich Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfungen erneut durch zuführen, da diese bemängelt wurden. Von einem Verbot kann überhaupt nicht die Rede sein. https://www.actu-environnement.com/media/pdf/jurisprudence/201.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772772224719610021
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 546320A5463D9A58412AA8E79782D6727E120E1139FC78AAF299E6C8B76C8E65
  • createdAtMillis - 1711521521459
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772772224719610021546320A5463D9A58412AA8E79782D6727E120E1139FC78AAF299E6C8B76C8E65