Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 01:17:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A72C7573B3E5549E1F5E28D607E478305877C8950D38A99EA7CCFE8C0C5431AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Historical references are given in the post. And those references are all correct, I checked. The interpretation of those references, as expressed here, is not unreasonable. Thus the post is a logical conclusion to make. Even if some people do not like that conclusion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772540335886836164
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A72C7573B3E5549E1F5E28D607E478305877C8950D38A99EA7CCFE8C0C5431AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1712711875978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772540335886836164A72C7573B3E5549E1F5E28D607E478305877C8950D38A99EA7CCFE8C0C5431AB