Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-26 15:58:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39DE925EB5040001577ADC7A33E8C75E01E64C9A6E1539FCB8A9542805105B37
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNC. Afirmar que sabes la verdadera razón de porqué recortaron la entrevista sin incluir fuentes relacionadas es más una opinión que una nota. En todo caso si crees que se recortó por eso entonces cuando dice que se recortó por sus criterios informativos ahí entra lo que dices.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772526264886108352
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39DE925EB5040001577ADC7A33E8C75E01E64C9A6E1539FCB8A9542805105B37
  • createdAtMillis - 1711468680863
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177252626488610835239DE925EB5040001577ADC7A33E8C75E01E64C9A6E1539FCB8A9542805105B37