Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-26 00:06:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0249169B0BFEDAE2CC917ED9C9CFFA4EC7951472C8F1823BCCDA98908090BBC5
Participant Details

Original Note:

No se necesita una nota, la licitación existió y si bien se suspendió, el articulo no señala cuanto se terminó gastando en el citado "estudio"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772354254344159499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0249169B0BFEDAE2CC917ED9C9CFFA4EC7951472C8F1823BCCDA98908090BBC5
  • createdAtMillis - 1711411588226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17723542543441594990249169B0BFEDAE2CC917ED9C9CFFA4EC7951472C8F1823BCCDA98908090BBC5