Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-25 19:27:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13409FA78F24B2801B3ACD5E7A790984DD659D7EF087CD927B5DC77154516B2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The site is not rife with trash talk or lies, it’s a platform that proffers diverse opinions to give a holistic examination of all sides of an argument. If anything, X is preserving democratic principles enshrined in our constitution and offers are more unbiased view https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/journalism-age-social-media

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772344265794081216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13409FA78F24B2801B3ACD5E7A790984DD659D7EF087CD927B5DC77154516B2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1711394842133
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177234426579408121613409FA78F24B2801B3ACD5E7A790984DD659D7EF087CD927B5DC77154516B2F