Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-25 12:42:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC04A9DA96BFC4DE487691583E09EA903F08A6E3D8A24E0B77D3853F3EF26E6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Paper has been criticized by many qualified researchers. "this article contains several fallacious scientific assumptions leading to misunderstandings and thus invalidating the conclusions drawn by the authors. We suggest that the article be retracted " https://retractionwatch.com/2022/08/22/what-happened-when-we-tried-to-get-a-paper-claiming-billions-of-lives-are-potentially-at-risk-from-covid-19-vaccines-retracted/ https://osf.io/preprints/osf/m58yh https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/the-problem-with-preprints/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12015-022-10465-2 https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32M69DU

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772241573952319640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC04A9DA96BFC4DE487691583E09EA903F08A6E3D8A24E0B77D3853F3EF26E6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1711370570779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772241573952319640EC04A9DA96BFC4DE487691583E09EA903F08A6E3D8A24E0B77D3853F3EF26E6D