Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-25 12:41:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Paper has been criticized by many qualified researchers. "this article contains several fallacious scientific assumptions leading to misunderstandings and thus invalidating the conclusions drawn by the authors. We suggest that the article be retracted " https://retractionwatch.com/2022/08/22/what-happened-when-we-tried-to-get-a-paper-claiming-billions-of-lives-are-potentially-at-risk-from-covid-19-vaccines-retracted/ https://osf.io/preprints/osf/m58yh https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/the-problem-with-preprints/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12015-022-10465-2 https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32M69DU

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772241573952319640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 77F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C
  • createdAtMillis - 1711370474403
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177224157395231964077F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C