Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-25 12:52:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Paper has been criticized by many qualified researchers. "this article contains several fallacious scientific assumptions leading to misunderstandings and thus invalidating the conclusions drawn by the authors. We suggest that the article be retracted " https://retractionwatch.com/2022/08/22/what-happened-when-we-tried-to-get-a-paper-claiming-billions-of-lives-are-potentially-at-risk-from-covid-19-vaccines-retracted/ https://osf.io/preprints/osf/m58yh https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/the-problem-with-preprints/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12015-022-10465-2 https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32M69DU

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772241573952319640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1711371134936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17722415739523196406EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9